<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Website Traffic – Its Relation to SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chaaban.info/2008/04/04/website-traffic-its-relation-to-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chaaban.info/2008/04/04/website-traffic-its-relation-to-seo/</link>
	<description>Tarek Chaaban, M.Sc&#039;s official blog. It contains current web  project portfolio, posts regarding his Canadian army experience, news, sports articles, and web tutorials on programming and using social networking technologies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 23:39:16 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jas</title>
		<link>http://www.chaaban.info/2008/04/04/website-traffic-its-relation-to-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>Jas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaaban.info/?p=382#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>I really agree with the last thing you&#039;ve said. I have seen many websites that are so clearly just keyword written that a user sees total gibberish, only the search engine bot sees great things lol. You could always cloak, though that is more black hat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really agree with the last thing you&#8217;ve said. I have seen many websites that are so clearly just keyword written that a user sees total gibberish, only the search engine bot sees great things lol. You could always cloak, though that is more black hat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.258 seconds -->
